W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2016

[Bug 29702] [XP31] Production rules in the text not unambiguous as a result of missing annotations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:44:56 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29702-523-UlCP05sadX@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29702

--- Comment #4 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> ---
(In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #3)
> (In reply to Michael Dyck from comment #2)
> > > 
> > > 3) Leave section A.1 as the Normative EBNF.
> > 
> > But if A,1 is the normative EBNF, shouldn't we still say that it is?
> Yes, I thought that was the idea.

But point #1 says to remove the sentence that asserts that the appendix is the
normative version of the EBNF.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 18:45:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:58:01 UTC