- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:44:03 +0200
- To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 16:44:13 UTC
There was supposed to be a note explaining this, but it seems to have got lost. And I think it should be ($val eq $val). The condition $val eq $val is true except when $val is NaN. This predicate therefore has the effect of discarding NaNs from the sequence. Michael Kay -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Buxton [mailto:stephen.buxton@oracle.com] Sent: 30 June 2003 15:36 To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: ORA-FO-EXAMPLES-MAX 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min Functions and Operators, Section 15.3.3 fn:max <fn:max> , 15.3.4 fn:min <fn:min> Why do we have "$val ne $val" in the example queries? Surely this condition will cause the query to return the empty sequence ?
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 16:44:13 UTC