W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: ORA-FO-OPEQUAL

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:44:10 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E62106073DCFA7@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: Stephen Buxton <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org

The handling of an empty sequence as an argument to the "eq" and "="
operators is described in sections 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 respectively of the XPath
language book.

I think it would be much better if the specification were not split between
two separate documents, and the WGs are looking at the feasibility of this.

Michael Kay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Buxton [mailto:stephen.buxton@oracle.com] 
> Sent: 30 June 2003 15:44
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: ORA-FO-OPEQUAL 
> 
> 
> 
> Where are the op-equal operators/functions defined ?
> 
> The specific equality functions (e.g. op-numeric-equal) are 
> defined, but 
> what is the behaviour on empty sequences as arguments to equals ?
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 16:44:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC