W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: ORA-FO-EXAMPLES-MAX 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:03:07 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09D17FA7@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Good catch!  That should be $val eq $val and is meant to exclude NaN.
I'll fix and add an explanatory comment.

All the best, Ashok 


From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:36 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: ORA-FO-EXAMPLES-MAX 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 


Functions and Operators, Section 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 

Why do we have "$val ne $val" in the example queries? Surely this
condition will cause the query to return the empty sequence ?
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 09:03:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC