- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:32:00 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-491: [external] feedback on prov:agent explanation. [PROV-O HTML] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/491 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: PROV-O HTML I was looking over the PROV-O writeup, and I want to raise two points. Pleas forward appropriately, if you deem it appropriate. If you search for "Property: prov:agent op" at http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ you find: "The property used by a prov:AgentInfluence to cite the Agent that influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." 1) A property is "used" by an agent influence to "cite"--is the agent influence writing a specification? Perhaps: "If x is in the prov:agent relationships with y, x is an instance of AgentInfluence and y is an instance of Agent that influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." OR (either way should be based on an established and clear convention for the document) "An agent influence is in the prov:agent relationship with an agent only if the agent influenced an Entity, Activity, or Agent." 2)For the first sentence the passage, that as the reader I assume is to begin defining the prov:activity property, does not mention prov:agent, it should. The passage that I mention in #1 is not in the first passage, and in fact is after the example that is given. This is confusing for the reader. If you are introducing and defining a property, then define the property first. I see the same thing for prov:activity. In searching for "Class: prov:AgentInfluence" I see that the initial passage for prov:AgentInfluence is the same initial passage for prov:agent and prov:activity. So perhaps this is part of some auto formatting/convention? Cheers, Patrice
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 14:32:04 UTC