- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:29:02 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|87bbc09f2c3133325243fe4d1b109355o0ADY608L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F0D8E9E>
Hi Tim, Satya, all How would the following proposal / making the activity identifier optional in the generation record/ would affect the ontology? Regards, Luc On 12/21/2011 09:57 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/205 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm > > > We may want to assert the time at which an entity is created. The placeholder for such time information is a generation record. But a generation mandates the presence of an activity identifier. But it may not be known. > > It would be nice if the activity identifier was made optional in the generation record. > > Does this have implications for the ontology? > > Cheers, > Luc > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 13:29:51 UTC