- From: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:48:49 -0500
- To: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Should Insertion and Removal have optional activity and agent arguments? Curt On 12/18/2012 11:03 AM, Tom De Nies wrote: > Specific questions we have for reviewers are: > > 1. Is the notation of Dictionary concepts clear & acceptable for you? > (in PROV-N and PROV-O) > 2. Are the constraints acceptable, or are they too loose/too strict? > 3. Are you happy with the solution to the issue regarding completeness? > (Tracing back to an EmptyDictionary) > 4. Is the note ready to be published as FPWD? > > We would like to end the internal review after the first week of the new > year. > > Thanks everyone, and happy holidays! > > Tom > > 2012/12/18 Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be > <mailto:sam.coppens@ugent.be>> > > Hello everybody, > > The Dictionary Note > (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/__raw-file/default/dictionary/__prov-dictionary.html > <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/prov-dictionary.html>) > has been finalised for review. Feedback on the note is welcome. > Could everybody also check the authors of the document? If someone > is missing, let us know. > > Thanks a lot! > > Best Regards, > > Sam & Tom
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 17:50:03 UTC