Re: PROV Dictionary

Specific questions we have for reviewers are:

1. Is the notation of Dictionary concepts clear & acceptable for you? (in
PROV-N and PROV-O)
2. Are the constraints acceptable, or are they too loose/too strict?
3. Are you happy with the solution to the issue regarding completeness?
(Tracing back to an EmptyDictionary)
4. Is the note ready to be published as FPWD?

We would like to end the internal review after the first week of the new
year.

Thanks everyone, and happy holidays!

Tom

2012/12/18 Sam Coppens Ugent <sam.coppens@ugent.be>

> Hello everybody,
>
> The Dictionary Note (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**
> raw-file/default/dictionary/**prov-dictionary.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dictionary/prov-dictionary.html>)
> has been finalised for review. Feedback on the note is welcome.
> Could everybody also check the authors of the document? If someone is
> missing, let us know.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Sam & Tom
>
>