public-poe-archives@w3.org from October 2017 by author

Ivan Herman via GitHub

• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Saturday, 7 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by iherman (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Saturday, 7 October)

Michael Steidl via GitHub

• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• [poe] Issue: IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property marked as bug (Wednesday, 11 October)
• [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Closed: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Saturday, 7 October)
• [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Friday, 6 October)
• [poe] Issue: Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource marked as JSON-LD (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by nitmws (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Tuesday, 3 October)

Renato Iannella via GitHub

• Closed: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] Conflict - invalid case (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] fixing selected examples (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] XML Schema issues (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Closed: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Monday, 30 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 27 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: [poe] inconsistent requirements wrt. profile definitions (Friday, 27 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] XML Schema issues (Thursday, 26 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] fixing selected examples (Thursday, 26 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism (Thursday, 26 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: [poe] Common Vocabulary Concepts/Terms used/referenced in Core Vocabulary Section (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] Conflict - invalid case (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonize 2.6.7 Remedy property with Prohibition (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Friday, 13 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Wednesday, 11 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Tuesday, 10 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Monday, 9 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Tuesday, 3 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Sunday, 1 October)
• [poe] new commits pushed by riannella (Sunday, 1 October)

simon via GitHub

• [poe] Issue: On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types marked as CR review (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] fix for examples in 3.3 ODRL Profile Mechanism (Wednesday, 25 October)
• [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• [poe] Issue: JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values marked as Editorial (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] IM: Constraint and Logical Constraint do not have a uid property (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: [poe] Unsatisfiable consequence example (Thursday, 5 October)

Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel via GitHub

• Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: [poe] the assignee(s) of the Duty MUST satisfy the Duty. (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: [poe] JSON-LD serialization of rightOperand values (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: [poe] Error in the ODRL JSON-LD context resource (Monday, 9 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 00:47:07 UTC