W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated

From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 05:48:24 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-334664236-1507268890-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@riannella adding "also" to the first para does not help as #275 shows. Based on that issue ODRL MUST sort out a Duty (including constraints and refinements) which must be fulfilled in a first round of evaluation and a Duty with maybe less constraints etc in a second round of evaluation which checks all the consequences - and this modified Duty should be made one of the consequences. This does not change the IM, only how to deal with a specific business need - include the original Duty in the second round - is modified but the feature as such is left untouched.

Re another _failure sub-property_: the ODRL WG must not change the IM anymore, inventing new things would go in this direction. And what should be the semantics of such a property - and how should it solve the problem?

GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/267#issuecomment-334664236 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 05:48:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:47:03 UTC