Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated

@riannella adding "also" to the first para does not help as #275 shows. Based on that issue ODRL MUST sort out a Duty (including constraints and refinements) which must be fulfilled in a first round of evaluation and a Duty with maybe less constraints etc in a second round of evaluation which checks all the consequences - and this modified Duty should be made one of the consequences. This does not change the IM, only how to deal with a specific business need - include the original Duty in the second round - is modified but the feature as such is left untouched.

Re another _failure sub-property_: the ODRL WG must not change the IM anymore, inventing new things would go in this direction. And what should be the semantics of such a property - and how should it solve the problem?

GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 05:48:32 UTC