Re: [poe] On requiring mutually disjoint sets of policy/rule types


I think the text "(as they are equivalent)" or the entire sentence 
should be removed, as they may create confusion.


For the examples in this document, the ODRL Policy subclasses are mapped 
to the JSON-LD @type <> tokens. *The above 
example could have also used |Policy| type instead of |Set| type (as 
they are equivalent).*
> -> |odrl:Policy owl:equivalentClass odrl:Set|
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
> <>, or mute the thread 
> <>.

Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
ETS de Ingenieros Informáticos
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34) 91336 3753
Skype: vroddon3

GitHub Notification of comment by vroddon
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2017 06:28:37 UTC