W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated

From: simon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 06:13:57 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-334368950-1507184023-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> If a business need requires to fulfil also the original obligation or duty then it must be expressed as a consequence.

related to that, what was the reason for requiring that ->
> Note that the consequence property MUST NOT be used on a Duty that is already a consequence for a Permission duty or Policy obligation.

avoiding cyclic dependencies?

GitHub Notification of comment by simonstey
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/267#issuecomment-334368950 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2017 06:13:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:47:03 UTC