Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated

@nitmws I think we did miss the word "also" in the first para of 2.6.3 Duty Class.
But we do - more formally - define the consequence property in Para 5.

Perhaps what is needed is *another* _failure_ sub-property?

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 6 October 2017 01:50:27 UTC