W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [poe] Harmonise how a Duty with consequences should be evaluated

From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 04:03:08 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-334352765-1507176174-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@nitmws my response has been based on the **current** IM narrative that states that the original duty MUST also be satisfied if it triggers the consequence duty.

I have asked @simonstey and @sabrina to verify/clarify that is the correct interpretation (as the consequence duty was introduced based on their requirements) #275 

If it turns out to be true, then we need to address the satisfaction issue of the original duty.
If it does not, then we need to update the IM (and this is a non-editorial change)

GitHub Notification of comment by riannella
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/267#issuecomment-334352765 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2017 04:06:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:47:03 UTC