- From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:09:19 +0200
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC5njqqcpwj6mY1LT1Y_Mp_qWAh7g9xNE-3E_A1a5addx-+Xig@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Philipp Cimiano < cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am afraid I will not be able to attend the ontolex telco this Friday. I > will now work on the document, so please provide your feedback by email. > > I would kindly ask you all to work on the sections in the document > assigned to you ;-) > > Other that that I wanted to clarify one issue regarding language codes in > the example. > > I have seen that some people (John?) have started to use the ISO 639-2 > codes (e.g. "ENG" for English, "SPA" for Spanish etc.). > I would propose we stick to the ISO 639-1 two-letter ISO 639-1 codes (e.g. > "EN", "ES") etc. There is no particular reason for this other than the fact > that most people know these codes. > Yes that would be me, I use the ISO 639-3 codes as they represent the most complete and usable list of codes. At any rate, this is not part of our standardization efforts and applications must support well-formatted codes using any ISO standard > > If the argument is recency and reusing the newest standard, then we would > have to go anyway for four letter codes according to ISO 639-6. > Erm 639-6 has a different purpose... it is not really appropriate here (and is equal to 639-3 for standard languages anyway) > > Regarding the particular versions of a language spoken in a particular > country, I recommend we follow the principle of IETF tags which consists of > the ISO code followed (if applicable) by a hyphen and the ISO 3166-1 code > of the country. Thus the variation of English spoken > in the United States would be: "en-us" while the version of English spoken > in Great Britain would be "en-gb". > There is a standard for this, namely RFC 5646, and we should follow that as with all RDF. (It does agree with your proposal here though) Regards, John > > I hope this is fine for everyone. I will add this information to the > document. > > Regards, > > Philipp. > > -- > > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) > Raum 2.307 > Universität Bielefeld > Inspiration 1 > 33619 Bielefeld > > >
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2014 11:09:48 UTC