- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 07:14:45 -0600
- To: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- CC: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, 'PÄ“teris Å…ikiforovs' <peteris.nikiforovs@tilde.lv>
>> After looking over the Phrasing elements again, I think there should >> be also other elements with nested, like code, iframe, noscript. > > I wouldn't specify a default for "code" since it can be both > withn-text=nested or within-text=yes, the latter e.g. in > <p>the <code>return</code> key ...</p>. The defaults are only for > cases with no ambiguity. Well, we have to have a default. For XML it's within-text='no', so we need to define something for HTML5. In the case of code I would say within-text='yes' too. >> Not sure how to handle most of the Interactive contents (3.2.5.1.7), >> like button, select, keygen, ... > > Then better let's define no defaults for these, and encourage users > to set within-text explicitly - which is the way to go anyway imo. I don't think we can not define a default: An ITS processor may be run without any explicit rules. I would say for HTML5 phrasing elements default to within-text='yes', and we list the exceptions, like <script>, <noscript>, <iframe>. We need to go through the elements are make decisions on the ambiguous cases. I think those changes do prevent us to publish the second last call. But since they affect Tilde's schedule (I think) we should try to get them done asap. -ys
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 13:15:49 UTC