W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

RE: Standoff Markup HTML - Difference Testoutput and Standard

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 05:39:49 -0600
To: "'Karl Fritsche'" <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>, "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000e01ce47f2$ec10ba20$c4322e60$@com>
"...can be linked to from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external"

the two 'to' sound weird and probably not grammatically correct, no?

Shouldn't the first be removed?
"...can be linked from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external"

-ys


-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Fritsche [mailto:karl.fritsche@cocomore.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 1:43 AM
To: Felix Sasaki
Cc: Yves Savourel; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'
Subject: Re: Standoff Markup HTML - Difference Testoutput and Standard

On 03.05.2013 08:48, Felix Sasaki wrote:
> Am 02.05.13 21:50, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>>> "In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script 
>>> element in the same or an linked HTML document, or can be linked to 
>>> from any reference to an external XML file with the standoff 
>>> inside."
>> +1
>>
>> But this is bringing up the case of an HTML-only processor that 
>> suddenly has to process XML (or vice-versa).
>> I guess processors supporting only one formats simply cannot process 
>> those type of references.
>> Which IMO is fine.
>>
>> -ys
>>
>>
> Thanks, Karl and Yves. The Related passages now look like this.
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#provenance-records-in-html5-constraint
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#loc-quality-issues-in-html5-constraint
>
>
> Hope that this is ok,
>
> Felix
>
I'm not 100% sure about the new sentence. As you pointed out your self you can not only point to a XML, also to a HTML. For me "or an linked HTML document" sounds like I can add a <link> element somehow, but it is the same as for XML, just point to it in the reference. I missed this yesterday in my proposal.
How about:
"In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script element in the same HTML document, or can be linked to from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external XML or HTML file with the standoff inside."
I added locQualityIssuesRef to make it clearer, which reference is mean. 
Because you can't to this with locQualityIssueProfileRef, which is somehow a reference too.

Cheers
Karl
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 11:40:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:08 UTC