- From: Karl Fritsche <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:42:42 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public' <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
On 03.05.2013 08:48, Felix Sasaki wrote: > Am 02.05.13 21:50, schrieb Yves Savourel: >>> "In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script >>> element >>> in the same or an linked HTML document, or can be linked to from any >>> reference to an external XML file with the standoff inside." >> +1 >> >> But this is bringing up the case of an HTML-only processor that >> suddenly has to process XML (or vice-versa). >> I guess processors supporting only one formats simply cannot process >> those type of references. >> Which IMO is fine. >> >> -ys >> >> > Thanks, Karl and Yves. The Related passages now look like this. > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#provenance-records-in-html5-constraint > > http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#loc-quality-issues-in-html5-constraint > > > Hope that this is ok, > > Felix > I'm not 100% sure about the new sentence. As you pointed out your self you can not only point to a XML, also to a HTML. For me "or an linked HTML document" sounds like I can add a <link> element somehow, but it is the same as for XML, just point to it in the reference. I missed this yesterday in my proposal. How about: "In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script element in the same HTML document, or can be linked to from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external XML or HTML file with the standoff inside." I added locQualityIssuesRef to make it clearer, which reference is mean. Because you can't to this with locQualityIssueProfileRef, which is somehow a reference too. Cheers Karl
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 07:43:32 UTC