W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Standoff Markup HTML - Difference Testoutput and Standard

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 16:56:06 +0200
Message-ID: <51867306.1050203@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
CC: 'Karl Fritsche' <karl.fritsche@cocomore.com>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org, 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public' <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Am 03.05.13 13:39, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> "...can be linked to from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external"
>
> the two 'to' sound weird and probably not grammatically correct, no?
>
> Shouldn't the first be removed?
> "...can be linked from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external"

Indeed, thanks for checking, Yves, fixed.

- Felix

>
> -ys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Fritsche [mailto:karl.fritsche@cocomore.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 1:43 AM
> To: Felix Sasaki
> Cc: Yves Savourel; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; 'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'
> Subject: Re: Standoff Markup HTML - Difference Testoutput and Standard
>
> On 03.05.2013 08:48, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>> Am 02.05.13 21:50, schrieb Yves Savourel:
>>>> "In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script
>>>> element in the same or an linked HTML document, or can be linked to
>>>> from any reference to an external XML file with the standoff
>>>> inside."
>>> +1
>>>
>>> But this is bringing up the case of an HTML-only processor that
>>> suddenly has to process XML (or vice-versa).
>>> I guess processors supporting only one formats simply cannot process
>>> those type of references.
>>> Which IMO is fine.
>>>
>>> -ys
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks, Karl and Yves. The Related passages now look like this.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
>> html#provenance-records-in-html5-constraint
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
>> html#loc-quality-issues-in-html5-constraint
>>
>>
>> Hope that this is ok,
>>
>> Felix
>>
> I'm not 100% sure about the new sentence. As you pointed out your self you can not only point to a XML, also to a HTML. For me "or an linked HTML document" sounds like I can add a <link> element somehow, but it is the same as for XML, just point to it in the reference. I missed this yesterday in my proposal.
> How about:
> "In HTML the standoff markup MUST either be stored inside a script element in the same HTML document, or can be linked to from any locQualityIssuesRef to an external XML or HTML file with the standoff inside."
> I added locQualityIssuesRef to make it clearer, which reference is mean.
> Because you can't to this with locQualityIssueProfileRef, which is somehow a reference too.
>
> Cheers
> Karl
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 5 May 2013 14:56:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:08 UTC