- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:45:36 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- Cc: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAL58czozPazh1hym=QpiAZdcn-Cye92vuDVSdXWjw7cMpEde3w@mail.gmail.com>
2012/10/24 Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com> > Hi Dave, Felix, all, > > The rarity of use case for pointers in those data categories is also > compounded when the data category has several values: As Felix noted, > because of the complete overriding clause, we can only use all pointers or > none for a data category. > > I would still argue to keep any refPointer to stand-off markup though. > XLIFF 2.0 is a use case for it. > +1. However, Mauricio had a nice example about global rules for provenance http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0291.html That seemed elegant and is similar to Dave's previous , so I'm not sure anymore how to move forward about the issue. Thoughts? Felix > > -yves > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Lewis [mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie] > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 5:37 PM > To: Felix Sasaki > Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > Subject: Re: issue-51 too many global rules > > Hi Felix, > I have a further thought actually on pointer and ref pointer attributes in > general below: > > On 23/10/2012 17:24, Felix Sasaki wrote: > > If nobody uses the expressiveness, we don't need to add it to new data > > categories in ITS 2.0. I still get nightmares from rubyPointer .... :) > > In ITS 1.0 the expressiveness was mostly used on a per format basis, > > e.g. saying "all 'alt' attributes at HTML 'img' should be translated. > > I don't see the "per document format" or even "per template" use case > > for > > > > QualityIssue, Quality Precis, Disambiguation, mtConfidence, text > > analysis annotation, translation provenance. > > > > So for these the "pointer attributes" (or even reference pointer only) > > might be sufficient. > > > > So, I'm not even sure that we need even the pointer attributes for certain > data categories. > > I tried to outlined in: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0079.html > > that pointer and points ref attributes didn't make much sense for data > categories that were more provenential in nature, i.e. the were generated > in the localisation chain, rather than being internationalisation > instructions from content authoring processes. > > I probably didn't argue this very clearly, and apologies Felix for being > slow in clarifying as you asked in: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0093.html > > Yves makes the point more succinctly in: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0272.html > > where he says: > "I'm less concerned with 'complex/rare' data categories like > Disambiguation, or MT Confidence, because it's unlikely an existing format > has the equivalent." > > I'd agree. Certainly with provenance I found it difficult to come up with > examples using Pointer and RefPointer data attributes. I couldn't think of > an existing schema elements that I'd point to, so the examples use rather > contrived elements. If this is the case, should we just state that people > should use the direct value or ref ITS data attributes and drop Pointer and > RefPointer in both GLOBAL and LOCAL usage? > > Shaun's excellent point about what to do when more than one node matches > the relative path of a pointer is also significant here in killing off > pointers: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Oct/0179.html > > I don't know if this applies to the quality issue data category. They use > Pointer for mapping to 'native' attributes in example80 in the current > draft, but did the native 'issue' element and those attributes 'type', > 'note', 'value' and 'profile' attribute reflect a known used schema? > > So, Felix, regardless of the outcome of the other global rule discussions, > in several cases (i.e. potentially for QualityIssue, Quality Precis, > transAgentProvenance, disambiguation, text analysis annotation/confidence > and mtconfidence) rather than pointers being 'sufficient', I don't think we > need them _at all_ (for global or local). > Thoughts? > > cheers, > Dave > > > Best, > > > > Felix > > > -- Felix Sasaki DFKI / W3C Fellow
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 03:46:00 UTC