- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:21:08 +1000
- To: Sami Vaarala <sami.vaarala@codebay.fi>
- Cc: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
I have committed this change. Cheers, Silvia. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Sami Vaarala <sami.vaarala@codebay.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> So, how about reformulating the paragraph to: >> >> According to RFC 3986, the term "URI" does not include relative >> references. In this document, we want to cover both, URIs and relative >> references. This requires us to use the term "URI reference" according >> to RC 3986. For simplicity reasons, this document, however, only uses >> the term 'media fragment URI' in place of 'media fragment URI >> reference'. > > This sounds good to me :) > > BR, > > -Sami > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 23:22:01 UTC