- From: Sami Vaarala <sami.vaarala@codebay.fi>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:45:49 +0300
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Hi, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > So, how about reformulating the paragraph to: > > According to RFC 3986, the term "URI" does not include relative > references. In this document, we want to cover both, URIs and relative > references. This requires us to use the term "URI reference" according > to RC 3986. For simplicity reasons, this document, however, only uses > the term 'media fragment URI' in place of 'media fragment URI > reference'. This sounds good to me :) BR, -Sami
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 07:48:56 UTC