W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

Response to your LC Comment -2404 on Media Ontology spec

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:05:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4CA2E522.40906@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Ivan,

The Media Annotations Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent 
[1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Ontlology for Media 
Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010.
Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send 
us comments.

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
Please review it carefully and *let us know by email at 
public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it* or not
before [09-oct-2010].
In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific 
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the 
opportunity to raise a formal objection which will
then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document 
to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.


For the Media Annotations Working Group,
Thierry Michel,
W3C Team Contact

2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/

MAWG Resolution:

The Media Annotations WG agrees that this first Last Call of the 
Ontology for Media Resource 1.0, is missing an RDF-representation of the 
Therefore the MAWG will add in the next publication of the Ontology for 
Media Resource an appendix with an RDF/OWL version of the ontology, (as 
it was initially planned and stated in the spec) and to fulfill our 
charter requirement.
This Ontlogy in RDF is currently available at
for review.
It is also included into the latest editor's draft of the Ontology

To respond to your second request we will also refer in the namespace 
document at http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont# to this RDF version of the 
ontology. (probably a content negotiation to an owl or HTML rendering of 
the RDF version as described in "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing 
RDF Vocabularies" at http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/#recipe3.

Finally, as we have added substantive updates in this specification, we 
plan to issue a short second Last Call soon.

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 07:05:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:43 UTC