- From: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 18:20:38 +0200
- To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- CC: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear all, given the definition of MF cited below, it makes sense to model MF like that. Best, Tobias Am 14.10.2010 15:34, schrieb Bailer, Werner: > Dear Davy, Jean-Pierre, all, > > I agree with the proposal that a media fragment is a subclass of media resource. > > Actually, this a clean way of modeling it, as we anyway couldn't prevent someone from expressing that by using a MFURI as the URI of a media resource. > > Best regards, > Werner > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media- >> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Evain, Jean-Pierre >> Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010 15:25 >> To: Davy Van Deursen >> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org >> Subject: RE : ma-ont RDF latest version >> >> Hi Davy, >> >> Thank for summarsing the semantics, that will help me answering the >> question... (I hope :-) >> >> [[ Therefore, we should first look at the definition of a media >> resource [1] and I believe that a media fragment >> falls under that definition (if not, please clarify why not): >> " A media resource is any physical or logical Resource that can be >> identified using a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), as defined >> by [RFC 3986]) , which has or is related to one or more media content >> types." More specifically, a media fragment is a physical >> resource, with a media content type (i.e., the same as its parent >> resource) and can be identified using a URI (i.e., a Media >> Fragments URI).]] >> >> This is effectively the key question and I would inviote the whole MAWG >> to consider this question. >> >> My first intention would have been to have media fragment as a subclass >> of media resource composed of audio and video tracks. If we all adopt >> and recognise more specifically that a fragment is a media resource >> which is iodentified by a MFURI I am happy with this but the group >> needs to confirm what the mediaFragment is. Then we could name >> (namedFragment, itself a subclass of fragment) and keyword a fragment >> and give him a URI. That would be 'clean'. >> >> Then if the question arises of whether a media fragment is a subclass >> of media resource, I would answer that any media resource is an atomic >> media fragment. >> >> In other words, I personally can agree with what you suggest but would >> like to hear from the group. >> >> Tobias and team, what do you think? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jean-Pierre >> ----------------------------------------- >> ************************************************** >> This email and any files transmitted with it >> are confidential and intended solely for the >> use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. >> If you have received this email in error, >> please notify the system manager. >> This footnote also confirms that this email >> message has been swept by the mailgateway >> ************************************************** >> > -- ================================================================ Dr. Tobias Bürger Knowledge and Media Technologies Group Salzburg Research FON +43.662.2288-415 Forschungsgesellschaft FAX +43.662.2288-222 Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/III tobias.buerger@salzburgresearch.at A-5020 Salzburg | AUSTRIA http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 16:21:18 UTC