Re: ma-ont RDF latest version

Hi all,

here are my comments concerning the latest verson of ma-ont:

Shouldn't the top level classes (Concept, Agent, Collection, Contributor, Location, MediaFragment, MediaResource) be disjoint or overlapping?
Since these classes are not overlapping, they should be marked as disjoint.

All subclasses of class Contributer - execpt class RatingProvider - have property restrictions (e.g. Actor actorIs some Person). 
Though an appropriate property - ratingProviderIs - is available.

Since now only some Contributor subclasses are described using property restrictions. Is there the intention to add property restrictions to the remaining classes as well?

The range definition for property duration is "MediaResource and not Image". 
An alternative way to describe this would be "AudioTrack or VideoTrack" (without negation) which could be easier to understand/interpret.  
The range definition for properties frameHeight, frameRate, frameWidth and samplingRate can be rephrased in a similar fashion.

Best,
Martin

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Evain, Jean-Pierre
Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. Oktober 2010 11:39
An: 'tmichel@w3.org'
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Betreff: RE: ma-ont RDF latest version

As requested...

Regards, JP



-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
Sent: mardi, 5. octobre 2010 11:31
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: ma-ont RDF latest version

Could you add inside the file, in a comment,  a version number (like
R12) and a date. It will ease when inserting the file into the Ont spec to track the version.

Thanks,

Thierry

Le 05/10/2010 09:22, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> Thanks Thierry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: lundi, 4. octobre 2010 22:16
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ma-ont RDF latest version
>
> Now Linked from the MA WG home page
>
> Le 04/10/2010 14:27, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please find attached the latest RDF version of the ontology. It is usually Tobias who post this on the reflector but he has problems with one of his servers and couldn't post the document before leaving. He therefore asked me to do it.
>>
>> Of course this will likely need to be updated as the ontology integrates all comments received.
>>
>> Some sub-properties are there to illustrate the implementation of some examples given in the semantics.
>>
>> Best regards, Jean-Pierre
>>
>>
>>
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they 
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system 
> manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by 
> the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 06:38:26 UTC