Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-173: split-appcache

On 12/10/2011, at 4:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:56:09 +0900, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
>>  Rationale: AppCache is clearly not of the same maturity and quality as the rest of the HTML5 specification; take-up has been quite slow, and it's often remarked that it's confusing and surprising to developers. While the W3C is planning a workshop to help adoption, it's not at all clear that AppCache is a suitable base for offline Web applications. Furthermore, it is a clearly separable part of the HTML specification.
> A. It is widely implemented and used quite a bit too.

Those are by nature subjective judgements, of course. However, the fact that the W3C feels the need to sponsor a workshop whose goal can be accurately paraphrased as "let's figure out why the hell people aren't using AppCache and Widgets," it's a good indication that something's wrong. 

See also the discussion on Steve Souders' recent blog entry:

> B. It integrates quite deeply with document loading, navigation, and HTML parsing. It is not clearly separable.

In that case, I ask the chairs for permission to make a proposal in prose.

>>  Proposal Details:
>>     1. "Cut Offline Web applications" from the HTML5 specification, along with all references to it.
>>     2. Create a new WD and paste the cut text into it as a separate, standalone draft. Note that W3C has already published a draft at <>, so this would effectively be reverting its incorporation into HTML5.
> These details do not address point B above.
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren

Mark Nottingham

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 05:13:48 UTC