Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-173: split-appcache

On 10/12/2011 01:13 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> On 12/10/2011, at 4:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> B. It integrates quite deeply with document loading, navigation,
>> and HTML parsing. It is not clearly separable.
> In that case, I ask the chairs for permission to make a proposal in
> prose.

I haven't yet checked with my co-chairs, but we would be inclined to 
accept a prose description of the changes to be made if the details are 
expected to be obvious or uncontroversial.  In this case, it appears to 
be the contrary.

As to the proposal being late, we did give a full month, but no fear: 
the normal status of an issue for which we received no Change Proposals 
is Closed without Prejudice.  Receipt of fully fleshed out Change 
Proposal in the next month or so is likely all that it would take to 
cause the issue to be reopened.   For best results, if you wish to 
pursue this, it is best if such Change Proposals are received well 
before Jan 14, 2012[1].

- Sam Ruby


Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 10:54:10 UTC