- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 03:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- cc: public-html@w3.org
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > > 1) We ask for a revert of this change to be completed no later than the > > > end of day on the 5th of October. If this revert is not complete by > > > that time, we will instruct W3C staff to make this change. > > > > > > 2) We ask that those who may wish to revisit the decision for issue 129, > > > do so by providing New Information, as requested by the decision: > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0005.html > > > > New information was provided in this case; it is listed in comment 3 of > > the bug in question (specifically the second paragraph). This is as was > > requested by the chairs. > > I disagree that new information was provided as requested by the chairs. You said, when objections were raised about the decision, that if there were specific parts of the decision that had problems, bugs should be filed with the new information, to be resolved separately. That's what happened. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:16:31 UTC