- From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 03:18:30 +0000
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "ian@hixie.ch" <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
We'd prefer this issue resolved now rather than later. I've gone ahead and written the change proposal (it seemed like the easiest way to give a detailed answer your questions). Included in it is an in depth explanation of: * Our implementation details * Example real world scenarios for the keyword * Customer requests for the keyword * Other implementers that are implementing our proposal http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/sandbox_allow_popups I'm happy to retract the escalation if we can make the change by amicable resolution. Thanks, Jacob > From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:24:32 +0000 (UTC) > To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, public-html@w3.org > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1110032321380.20981@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, HTML Weekly Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> HTML-ISSUE-180 (allowpopups): Add "allow-popups" for iframe@sandbox [HTML 5 spec] >> >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/180 >> >> Raised by: Adrian Bateman >> On product: HTML 5 spec >> >> This issue was raised on behalf of Jacob Rossi, based on the following >> bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12393 > > This bug was not rejected. Adding allow-popups is still on the list of > things I intend to address. There's no reason to escalate it. > > As the bug specifically indicates, we need more implementation experience > before we can know if this is a sensible thing to do or not, including, in > particular, input from Microsoft based on authoring experience with the > feature as implemented in IE10. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 03:19:00 UTC