W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Revert request for r6610, and moving forward on ISSUE-129

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:57:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4E8A59E8.1040509@intertwingly.net>
To: public-html@w3.org
On 10/03/2011 07:20 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> 1) We ask for a revert of this change to be completed no later than the
>> end of day on the 5th of October.  If this revert is not complete by
>> that time, we will instruct W3C staff to make this change.
>> 2) We ask that those who may wish to revisit the decision for issue 129,
>> do so by providing New Information, as requested by the decision:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0005.html
> New information was provided in this case; it is listed in comment 3 of
> the bug in question (specifically the second paragraph). This is as was
> requested by the chairs.

I disagree that new information was provided as requested by the chairs. 
  The process for new information is quite clear:


You are welcome to pursue new information separately, meanwhile, the 
request to revert still stands.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 00:57:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:17 UTC