Re: ISSUE-27(rel-ownership) Call for Change Proposal advocates

> The goal here is to see if we can reduce the number of options in
> order
> to make the survey run smoother. Unless you say something stronger, I
> will interpret this input as you are OK with any survey as long as it
> contains at least one of the three choices (#2 and #3 above as well as
> the one that Jonas writes).

I'll be more clear then: I'm not OK with http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/RelRegistryAtTheW3C not appearing on the poll.

While I'd personally be OK with a wiki at microformats.org or whatwg.org, I think it makes sense for the poll to give the opportunity for the middle ground to draw the weakest objections instead of forcing a decision between wiki at a personally-owned domain vs. the IANA.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 17:44:01 UTC