- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:56:09 -0500
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/11/2010 04:31 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:05, Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> On Nov 10, 2010, at 15:16, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >>> 1. Change Proposal: Replace Wiki-Based Link Relation Registry with IANA registry proposed by "Web Linking" draft >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/1006.html >>> >>> 2. Change Proposal: A wiki is fine >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0363.html >> >> Either of these (or the proposal Jonas volunteered to write) works for me, so you may count me as an advocate for these. > > Ooops. I highlighted the wrong lines in my email client. Sorry. I meant so say I'm OK with these: > >> 2. Change Proposal: A wiki is fine >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0363.html >> >> 3. Change Proposal: Rel Registry at the W3C >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/RelRegistryAtTheW3C The goal here is to see if we can reduce the number of options in order to make the survey run smoother. Unless you say something stronger, I will interpret this input as you are OK with any survey as long as it contains at least one of the three choices (#2 and #3 above as well as the one that Jonas writes). - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 14:56:43 UTC