- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:13:49 -0400
- To: martin@weborganics.co.uk
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Martin McEvoy wrote: > but Microdata has gone out its way > it seems to ignore, the principle of "not teaching your grandmother to > suck eggs" ie Ignoring everything that has gone before it Clearly this is a contentious subject.... so it is important that everybody stay on topic. Accordingly, I would like to ask a number of things of you: 1) Consider reducing the frequency of your posts. Six posts in a two hour span is a bit much. Give others a chance to participate. 2) Stick to the facts, minimizing editorializing (such as the quote above, and there are others). 3) At the moment, the topic is "microdata in the html5 spec, or as a separate spec". If you really want to make a case for "no microdata, not even in a separate spec", make that clear (I'd suggest a new subject line). But, I'll caution you that that will require a high bar: Neither RDFa being there first, or being better on some axes, will be sufficient. There are plenty of examples of standards bodies standardizing multiple overlapping solutions to the same problem; there even are examples within the W3C. - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 01:14:20 UTC