- From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:53:12 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Martin McEvoy wrote: > Why use microdata at all when microformats already exist, I cant > think of a single microdata use case that isn't already solved by > microformats and RDFa, by the way microformats and RDFa work very > niceley together on the same page, I would hate to try and mix micro > data with microformats or RDFa The above is truly the crux of my Issue , Microformats and RDFa do exist today , they actually work in perfect harmony together it was a design principle of RDFa that it doesn't break microformats which in itself was very intuitive, a win win, but Microdata has gone out its way it seems to ignore, the principle of "not teaching your grandmother to suck eggs" ie Ignoring everything that has gone before it, both Microformats and RDFa have undergone years of development millions of man hours have been spent on developing and publishing microformats on their own, and suddenly over a matter of months with no public discussion a single man says he can do it better and makes it a part of the future of html, amazing!! You seem to be confident with your proposal How about a vote do we keep it or not? Best wishes -- Martin McEvoy http://weborganics.co.uk/ "You may find it hard to swallow the notion that anything as large and apparently inanimate as the Earth is alive." Dr. James Lovelock, The Ages of Gaia
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 21:53:42 UTC