- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:39:21 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: HTMLWG Tracking WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > So concretely, I suggest that we > * consider ARIA a separate issue from SVG/MathML integration and > syntax-wise done (and about to ship) > * focus on integrating SVG/MathML into text/html as non-extension parts > of the open Web platform > * avoid getting carried away with general extensibility at the expense > of the specific languages that we know in advance (SVG and MathML) > * consider the DOM-level node namespacing of SVG and MathML a legacy > constraint > * not consider the xmlns syntax as a necessary mechanism for putting > the nodes in those namespaces > ... For the record: I disagree with that direction. Trying to integrate SVG and MathML into HTML seems to be inferior to having a generic solution. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 09:39:49 UTC