- From: Dave Orchard <orchard@pacificspirit.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:39:23 -0700
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'Henri Sivonen'" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "'HTMLWG Tracking WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
+1 to Julian's POV. I'd rather have a generic solution than just 2 languages. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:39 AM > To: Henri Sivonen > Cc: HTMLWG Tracking WG > Subject: Re: SVG and MathML in text/html > > > Henri Sivonen wrote: > > So concretely, I suggest that we > > * consider ARIA a separate issue from SVG/MathML integration and > > syntax-wise done (and about to ship) > > * focus on integrating SVG/MathML into text/html as non-extension > > parts of the open Web platform > > * avoid getting carried away with general extensibility at the > > expense of the specific languages that we know in advance (SVG and > > MathML) > > * consider the DOM-level node namespacing of SVG and > MathML a legacy > > constraint > > * not consider the xmlns syntax as a necessary mechanism > for putting > > the nodes in those namespaces ... > > For the record: I disagree with that direction. Trying to > integrate SVG and MathML into HTML seems to be inferior to > having a generic solution. > > BR, Julian > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 23:40:14 UTC