- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:47:38 -0500
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:35 +0000, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > [...] I find it somewhat > unsatisfactory that issues as important as "What should we > publish first ?" are subjected only to a "informal poll" > rather than a binding vote (Dan C wrote : "It was an informal > poll rather than a binding decision, so I wouldn't use the word > "agreed", but that's a quibble..."), and I think this may explain > why (as far as I can tell), this group has so far agreed to very > little apart from its starting point. I sympathize; lots of us find it somewhat unsatisfactory that we're going so slowly. But I think some momentum is building. You might recall that we did conduct a binding vote regarding publication of "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4"; it didn't carry: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0363.html We discuss progress toward first Working Draft publication just about every week in the teleconference. See items "toward release of Design Principles" and "Detailed Spec Reviews, toward 1st public WD of design" in this week's agenda http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 and in minutes from 18 Oct http://www.w3.org/2007/10/18-html-wg-minutes -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 22:47:46 UTC