public-html-admin@w3.org from August 2014 by author

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 26697] New: Typo: Missing ampersand in section 4.7.5.1.4 (Saturday, 30 August)
• [Bug 26686] New: Dropzone operation and effectAllowed (Thursday, 28 August)
• [Bug 26684] New: change aria refs to point to aria 1.1 (Thursday, 28 August)
• [Bug 26675] New: Generic Span definition (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 26670] New: make author conformance requirements for role clearer (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 26667] New: window.parent needs [Replaceable] to match interop + browsers (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 26659] New: [InbandTracks] no definition for "text track in-band metadata track dispatch type" (Monday, 25 August)
• [Bug 26658] New: window.parent needs [Replaceable] to match interop + browsers (Monday, 25 August)
• [Bug 26657] New: matrix in Path2D's addPath method should be marked as optional (Monday, 25 August)
• [Bug 26653] New: Remove .longdesc IDL attribute (Monday, 25 August)
• [Bug 26634] New: commands API not in HTML5 (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26630] New: contextmenu attribute not in html5 (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26629] New: may be worth mentioning changes in alt /img requirement (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26628] New: change article and section to reflect HTML5 definitions (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26625] New: add blockquote to changed elements (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26624] New: cite element description does not reflect html5 definition (Thursday, 21 August)
• [Bug 26621] New: [AAPI]: @indeterminate is not mapped in HTML-AAM (Wednesday, 20 August)
• [Bug 26619] New: elements listed, but not in HTML5 so need removing (Wednesday, 20 August)
• [Bug 26616] New: main element description (Wednesday, 20 August)
• [Bug 26597] New: XHTML media-type compatibility (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 26591] New: missing informative info in head sections of element definitions (Sunday, 17 August)
• [Bug 26589] New: Note/example contains 'details'/'summary' reference (Saturday, 16 August)
• [Bug 26550] New: Definition of "valid MIME type" still refers to RFC 2616 (Sunday, 10 August)
• [Bug 26531] New: include rev in the list of obsolete attributes in the spec (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 26530] New: reverse hyperlink attribute rev missing in HTML5 (Wednesday, 6 August)

Chockalingam

• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Saturday, 2 August)

Coralie Mercier

• Call for Exclusions (Update): W3C HTML JSON form submission; W3C HTML Form HTTP Extensions (Thursday, 28 August)

David Singer

• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 4 August)
• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 4 August)

Edward O'Connor

• Re: Formal Objection to advancing the HTML Image Description document along the REC track (Monday, 25 August)
• Formal Objection to advancing the HTML Image Description document along the REC track (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: CfC: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 1 August)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: CfC: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 1 August)

Janina Sajka

• Re: Comments on HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) (Tuesday, 26 August)

Jim Allan

• Re: CfC: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 1 August)

Joanmarie Diggs

• Re: Comments on HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) (Monday, 25 August)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Formal Objection to HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 1 August)

Matthew Turvey

• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 3 August)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: Formal Objection to advancing the HTML Image Description document along the REC track (Thursday, 21 August)
• Re: CfC: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 1 August)

Paul Cotton

• RE: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 4 August)
• RE: CfC: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 1 August)
• RE: Formal Objection to HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives Last Call Working Draft (Friday, 1 August)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• FYI: HTML5 Image Description Extension is a Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 12 August)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Formal Objection to advancing the HTML Image Description document along the REC track (Thursday, 21 August)

Sam Ruby

• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 14 August)
• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 4 August)
• WG Decision: Request transition of Image Description to Candidate Recommendation (Saturday, 2 August)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Formal Objection to advancing the HTML Image Description document along the REC track (Friday, 22 August)
• Fwd: Comments on HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) (Friday, 22 August)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 August 2014 12:37:03 UTC