W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > May 2013

AW: AW: [QB-UCR] Review comments

From: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:25:46 +0000
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0D7BFFD7C415144DA75C3D49C46AC21512ACE228@ex-ms-1a.fzi.de>
Hi Dave,

Thanks a lot for the case study.

> I've attached a draft of this for inclusion in your document when you
> are ready to do so. Feel to tweak it to fit your structure if
> necessary.
For the other case studies, I mentioned expected benefits of using the data cube vocabulary. Can you maybe name some for this case study?

> If you are happy with it then I suggest linking lesson 4.4 to this
> one
> instead of the Bathing Water one.
I'll do.

Best,

Benedikt

________________________________________
Von: Dave Reynolds [dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2013 13:22
An: Benedikt Kaempgen
Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group
Betreff: Re: AW: [QB-UCR] Review comments

Hi Benedikt,

On 28/05/13 22:35, Dave Reynolds wrote:

> OK I will attempt to write up a case study for the MetOffice example
> that would be better motivation and explanation of the ISO19156 issues
> than the Bathing Water on.

I've attached a draft of this for inclusion in your document when you
are ready to do so. Feel to tweak it to fit your structure if necessary.

If you are happy with it then I suggest linking lesson 4.4 to this one
instead of the Bathing Water one.

Copied to the list so I can say ...

"I believe this closes ACTION-92" :)

Dave


Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 13:26:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:08 UTC