- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:37:38 +0100
- To: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Benedikt, On 30/05/13 14:25, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Thanks a lot for the case study. > >> I've attached a draft of this for inclusion in your document when you >> are ready to do so. Feel to tweak it to fit your structure if >> necessary. > For the other case studies, I mentioned expected benefits of using the data cube vocabulary. Can you maybe name some for this case study? OK. I suggest: * Explicit metadata describing the forecast process, coverage and phenomena being forecast; making the data self-describing. * Linking to other linked data resources (particularly geographic regions and named places associated with the forecast locations) enabling discovery of related data. * Ability to define slices through the data for convenient consumption by applications. Dave
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 13:38:11 UTC