- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:22:46 +0200
- To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- CC: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dave, If the configuration is like this, why is it sending a message that says that all that can be done is to wait for a moderator's approval? (see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Apr/0124.html) Antoine On 18/04/18 10:45, Dave Raggett wrote: > I’ve looked at the public-dxwg-comments configuration, and as Phil said, it is configured to use the archive approval system. The first time it sees mail from an address, it sends a confirmation back to that address to get the sender's consent to archive that and future emails. If your mail is not reaching W3C lists, look for AA messages sent from aa-sender@listhub.w3.org <mailto:aa-sender@listhub.w3.org> (don't forget to look in your spam box as well). > > More details at: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ > > > >> On 17 Apr 2018, at 10:06, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> I'm wondering whether the mailing list public-dxwg-comments@w3.org works well for us. >> I just had to forward myself a perfectly legit mail from a colleague, which was blocked. And the number of emails that we got on this list is not high: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-comments/ >> Could it be that others were blocked? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Antoine >> > > Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett > W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 09:23:25 UTC