Re: [dxwg] Allow license property to link to other than LicenseDocument

I have several remarks:

- we need to be careful with the wording and not hint that all CC statements are licenses. Some CC statements would end up in dct:licenses, some others in dct:rights.

- using odrl:hasPolicy is handy indeed to avoid categorizing the policy more precisely. But if there's a policy that doesn't fall in dct:rights, then it doesn't help meeting our original requirements? If we don't have a requirement that extend to any kind of permissions and obligations then we don't need odrl:hasPolicy. This was the meaning of my question at which was unanswered. I've checked and don't see such requirements clearly there.
NB: I'm not formally against odrl:hasPolicy if there's a corresponding requirement, I'm just interested in keeping DCAT as minimal as required.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 09:20:11 UTC