W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > April 2017

Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 08:06:07 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-291074888-1491206766-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
If it is "idle", shouldn't it be "active". So "activating" is basically meaning "changing state", I am wondering whether some sensors will require time to shut down, so whether we need a "deactivating", because start() won't take immediate effect.

So this comes to my question, what will users use the "activating" state for? And will those use-cases apply to a "deactivating" state as well?

GitHub Notification of comment by kenchris
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-291074888 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 08:06:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:53 UTC