Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

Moving this forward, I'd lie us to answer the following questions here:

1. Are those three states a good model internally (for spec editing)? *(y|n)*
2. Do we want to expose state at all? *(y|n|maybe later)*
3. If we want to expose state now, do we expose it as an enum or a boolean "activated" attribute? *(enum|boolean)*
4. If we expose those externally, what do we name those three states?
5. What do we name the start/stop methods? *(start/stop|activate/deactivate|something else)*



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-291087269 using your GitHub account