W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > April 2017

Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 08:54:45 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-291085290-1491209684-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> Yes, I think it should be "idled".

Well, "stopped" in that case. But then that's weird as first state. I don't want to Bikeshed this into eternity, though.

> Will there be an onidled event handler as well?

No, because it's sync.

> Hmm, old cached readings would probably be quite bad though, as many changes can have happened since I used the sensor last and mixing those with new readings will introduce errors. What is the use-case for that?

Saving battery, e.g. for geolocation. Maybe this needs its own API, though. Tracked here: https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/89

GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-291085290 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 08:54:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:53 UTC