W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > April 2017

Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 08:49:04 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-291084017-1491209343-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Yes, I think it should be "idled". Will there be an onidled event handler as well?

Hmm, old cached readings would probably be quite bad though, as many changes can have happened since I used the sensor last and mixing those with new readings will introduce errors. What is the use-case for that?

GitHub Notification of comment by kenchris
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-291084017 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 08:49:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:53 UTC