- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:16:57 -0400
- To: "Linss, Peter" <peter.linss@hp.com>
- Cc: Public CSS Test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>
Le 2015-08-15 21:06, Linss, Peter a écrit : > On Aug 14, 2015, at 8:35 PM, Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org> > wrote: >> >> Peter, >> >> I've read >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Aug/0020.html >> >> https://wiki.csswg.org/test/implementation-report >> >> I would be ready and interested to enter test results of Prince 10 rev >> 3 for the CSS3 Writing Modes test suite *nightly-unstable* build and >> submit an implementation report. >> >> 1- Is this possible? > > Yes. > >> >> 2- If so, then what would be the DATESTAMP: >> # http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/ >> <http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/> > > That field isn’t really needed anymore. It was intended to be the > date/time (in ISO yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format) of the time the results > were recorded. > Isn't that DATESTAMP field associated with the alpha or beta or CR status of the test suite? # http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20100917/ is RC1 while # http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/ is RC6 If I submit an implementation report for Prince 10 rev 4, then should I remove that DATESTAMP line entirely or just leave it as # http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/ <http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/> ? >> >> 3- >> When a test line has many characters in its 2nd (middle) column (in >> the column between testname and result), what does it mean? >> eg >> >> html/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-003.htm d3088b2113ff9dc88028dc89b4d030a83db59a2b ? >> xhtml1/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-003.xht d3088b2113ff9dc88028dc89b4d030a83db59a2b ? >> html/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-005.htm b959f5e9a4d09adc6784d74741b43ff0ac1ea0ca ? >> xhtml1/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-005.xht b959f5e9a4d09adc6784d74741b43ff0ac1ea0ca ? > > The second column is the changeset ID that the test was last modified > in. Just leave it in place, it let’s the test harness associate the > result with the exact revision of the test. > Okay... it makes sense. > > There are two ways that you can submit tests for Prince, you can > either generate an implementation report using the template that > you’ve found, or you can set the proper user agent string in the > harness and just run the tests. > > People with appropriate permissions (you are one of them) can upload > the implementation reports yourself directly into the test harness. On > the “Run Tests” page first click the “Change” link at the top pf the > page to change the user agent to the one you’re entering test for (if > it’s not the browser you’re using), then click the “Batch Upload” > button on the “Run Tests” page. Enter the date/time and upload the > file. > > When you set the user agent, you can either pick the user agent you > want from the list (if it’s present), or you can enter the entire user > agent string of the agent. For Prince it should be something like: > Prince/10.0 (http://www.princexml.com; Linux i686) The 'Linux i686' string is not fetchable... otherwise I do not know how you got it. I have tried to query all possible navigator attributes for Prince and never got the complete infor what you indicate here: Prince can not handle the ListAllNavigatorAttributesAndMethods() function I have in http://www.gtalbot.org/DHTMLSection/ListAllAttributesAndMethodsOfObjects.html So, I created http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3WritingModes/query-navigator-attributes.html and I use in command line ~$ prince --javascript query-navigator-attributes.html and I still do not get os and cpu attributes or build number which would be useful. I guess ~$ prince --version info is sufficient. > Alternatively you can just email the implementation report to me and > I’ll upload it for you. > > Peter Peter, thank you for your complete response. I appreciate this. Prince 10 rev 4 does not support 'text-orientation', it does not support 'text-combine-upright' and it only support 'writing-mode: vertical-rl' . So, the number of tests with useful+revealing test results or worth testing for Prince is about 150 tests. Right now, the first 6 lines of the implementation report I intend to submit look like this: # Prince 10 rev 4 Kubuntu Linux 14.04.3 LTS # Prince/10 (www.princexml.com) # http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/ <http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/DATESTAMP/> testname revision result comment html/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-003.htm d3088b2113ff9dc88028dc89b4d030a83db59a2b na (vertical-lr not implemented) xhtml1/abs-pos-non-replaced-icb-vlr-003.xht d3088b2113ff9dc88028dc89b4d030a83db59a2b na (vertical-lr not implemented) ... Gérard -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Sunday, 16 August 2015 21:17:28 UTC