- From: Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 04:24:05 -0400
- To: 塩澤 元 (Shiozawa, Hajime) <hajime.shiozawa@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public CSS test suite mailing list <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
Le 2015-08-13 02:53, 塩澤 元 a écrit : > Gérard, > > Thank you for reviewing :-) > > I've fixed. > https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/ee1be7e5f943 > > Change Point > - "/* computes to 60px */" is replaced with "/* computes to 60px/60px > */" > in all inline-[block | table]-alignment-00* > - used "L" for last and "F" for first instead of "I" and "B". > -- it is only for central baseline alignment tests because in > alphabetical > alignment test we should use "É". Correct. > > Hajime. > Please add a <link rel="reviewer" title="Gérard Talbot" href="http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/" /> <!-- 2015-08-13 --> into those 4 inline-table-alignment-00[2-5] tests. Gérard > > 2015-08-13 6:45 GMT+09:00 Gérard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>: > >> Le 2015-08-12 12:10, 塩澤 元 a écrit : >> >>> Gérard, >>> >>> I've submitted a new tests for inline-table alignment. >>> https://hg.csswg.org/test/rev/b7df87b05e86 >>> >>> I have created tests for only 'mixed' and 'upright' because you >>> mentioned >>> that it is better to do so only for this two properties.^[1] >>> >>> [1]: >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2015Jul/0035.html >>> >>> Hajime. >>> >> >> >> inline-table alignment - central alignment with vertical layout >> >> http://test.csswg.org/source/css-writing-modes-3/inline-table-alignment-002.xht >> >> >> Proposed minor tunings for all 4 inline-table-alignment-00? tests >> >> font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px */ >> >> replaced with >> >> font: 3.75em/1 Ahem; /* computes to 60px/60px */ >> >> >> <span class="row" id="last">B</span> >> >> replaced with >> >> <span class="row" id="last">T</span> >> >> >> I am now thinking we should have been using "L" (for last) and "F" >> (for >> first) instead of "I" and "B" in all inline-[block | >> table]-alignment-00? >> tests so that the tests are easier to review with those more helpful, >> meaningful characters. >> >> Overall, all 4 tests look excellent and they should be a good >> challenge >> and meaningful testing for browser manufacturers. >> >> Gérard >> -- >> Test Format Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html >> >> Test Style Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html >> >> Test Templates >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html >> >> CSS Naming Guidelines >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html >> >> Test Review Checklist >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html >> >> CSS Metadata >> http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html >> -- Test Format Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-format-guidelines.html Test Style Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-style-guidelines.html Test Templates http://testthewebforward.org/docs/test-templates.html CSS Naming Guidelines http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-naming.html Test Review Checklist http://testthewebforward.org/docs/review-checklist.html CSS Metadata http://testthewebforward.org/docs/css-metadata.html
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2015 08:24:36 UTC