- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 19:02:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Justin Wood wrote: >> >> Good point. The new text will read: >> >> <p>Select everything in this document. The following two constructs >> (in the thick black borders) should end up looking identical. You >> should also check that the cursor is the same on equivalent parts >> (in particular the cursor should either be a crosshair over "Tree" >> and the default everywhere else, or the default everywhere).</p> >> >> Let me know if that is clear enough. > > Sounds good, but my marking 'should' that implies (at least to me) that > it /is/ still possible to pass if the cursor is not the same, even on a > UA that supports cursor. The pass/fail criteria is more what I was > looking at in that test. "Should" means it is a requirement. It's English. :-) (The test suite doesn't refer to RFC2119.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.index.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 15:02:35 UTC