- From: Justin Wood <jw6057@bacon.qcc.mass.edu>
- Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 15:24:15 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-css-testsuite@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: >On Sat, 29 May 2004, Justin Wood wrote: > > >>>Good point. The new text will read: >>> >>> <p>Select everything in this document. The following two constructs >>> (in the thick black borders) should end up looking identical. You >>> should also check that the cursor is the same on equivalent parts >>> (in particular the cursor should either be a crosshair over "Tree" >>> and the default everywhere else, or the default everywhere).</p> >>> >>>Let me know if that is clear enough. >>> >>> >>Sounds good, but my marking 'should' that implies (at least to me) that >>it /is/ still possible to pass if the cursor is not the same, even on a >>UA that supports cursor. The pass/fail criteria is more what I was >>looking at in that test. >> >> > >"Should" means it is a requirement. It's English. :-) (The test suite >doesn't refer to RFC2119.) > > > Regardless Hixie, with the rest of W3C using the RFC defs, and the testsuite not, it is misleading to potential test-suite users. ~Justin Wood
Received on Saturday, 29 May 2004 15:25:48 UTC